| Author |
Message |
bigbro_1985
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 Posts: 1
|
Posted: February 14, 2011 11:38 PM Post subject: Simultaneous Equation Solver - Using Complex Numbers |
|
|
Hi,
I'm using the TI-89 Titanium, I'm trying to solve complex number simultaneous equations. I haven't been able to find tutorials regarding this, so I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or if it's not capable of performing complex notation with simultaneous equations.
I do have it on complex mode (Rectangular), and it works with real numbers I tested it.
For example:
(4+j2)X + (-4)Y = -20
(-4)X + (6+j4) = -46.03 - j14.96
Entry:
a(1,1)=4+2i
a(1,2)=-4
b1[1]=-20
a(2,1)=-4
a(2,2)=6+i4
b1[2]=-46.03-i14.96
The Answer should be:
X=0.7135 + j2.281
Y=-5.431 + j2.642
What I'm getting:
X= -4.994 + j10.86
Y= -5.425 + j8.364
I've tried it in polar/rectangular and a combination of the two always get the same result.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Marco |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mellamokb
Joined: 10 May 2007 Posts: 124
|
Posted: February 15, 2011 9:34 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Marco,
Solving complex number equations should be no problem for the TI-89. I tried the problem myself using the built-in csolve (complex solve) function:
| Code: |
csolve((4+2i)x + (-4)y = -20 and (-4)x + (6+4i)y = -46.03 - 14.96i,{x,y})
|
I get the same answers as you:
| Code: |
x = -4.99429 + 10.8614i and y = -5.425 + 8.36429i
|
Can you verify that the equations and the answer you are supposed to get are correct? Why do you think the answer is wrong?
Hope this helps!
Regards,
~ mellamokb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mellamokb
Joined: 10 May 2007 Posts: 124
|
Posted: February 15, 2011 9:39 AM Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Marco,
Just to add an update. I experimented with plugging in the answers you expected into the original equations. I get a different answer than the equations, meaning the answer you are expecting cannot be correct.
For example, if x=0.7135+j2.281 and y=-5.431+j2.642, then the first equation gives +20 instead of -20. So I'm guessing you have a typographical error in the equation, and need to compare it back to where the problem came from. If you solve with +20, you get the answers you expected on the TI-89 using either solving method.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
~ mellamokb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Saphic 1.5 // Theme created by Sopel
|
|